Details » OGame and Space-Pioneers
- Url: http://ogandsp.informe.com/
- Category: Computers & Internet
- Description: Das ist ein Forum für Ogame und Space-Pioneers
- Members: 11
- Created On: Jan 2, 2007
- Posts: 0
- Hits: 13919
Post your rating:
xQAxRZ Im grateful for the article post. Cool.
would provide more reoesrcus for that war once in office. In fact, if you go on www.politifact.com you will see how he is doing on his promises made on the campaign trail. I posted the tracking to this comment Actually his tracking is doing well, but we are so damn inpatient and think everything can happen tomorrow is at best unrealistic. He does not have any easy job and I would like to see anyone think that the can do better considering he only has control of the Executive branch and not the other two.Now I think he needs to get tough with the democrats and whip them in line.Tracking Obama's promises91 Promise Kept 33 Compromise 15 Promise Broken 87 Stalled 275 In the Works 2 Not yet rated I think democrats and republicans different wings of the same bird and that is a major problem with a two-party system. People are more loyal to party affiliation than what is good for the country.
children shouldn't smoke pot, and that it's an adult avcitity. You attempted to portray prohibition as somehow protecting children, when ALL reformers know it harms them.>>> In the face of my 2 year old articles I’ve written You really should try quitting resting on your laurels. The only thing I had to judge by was what you were saying mostly prohibitionist arguments. If you want to stop being seen in that light, stop making their case.>>> crying for legalization and those here who say I’m not a prohibitionist you’re still stupid enough to try and make me out to be a prohibitionist because thats your only link to having an argument.>>> its not “ABSOLUTELY” safe. Period Okay. Let's try to make some progress here. We'll let it slide on who began it, and I'll AGREE with you! Marijuana is not absolutely safe. Smoking it can cause minor irritation to the lungs, and newbies can get into trouble if they go out driving after they take their first tokes.Happy?
that people like me euatqe marijuana to alcohol.Hes a punk, the kind of disengenuous full of crap people that I have no tolerance for.To have your opinion is one thing. But to base your argument on accusations and falsehoods stated as fact that you cannot prove is just plain sleazyHe lies, hes an opportunist in that he demeans the sources that argue his point and supports that same source when it makes his point.He promotes the cause on stupid statements such as pot to be ABSOLUTELY safe and that there are none of the obvious problems seen with pot to worry about.He reminds me of when Ahmajinedad stood in front of the world and said that they have no gays in Iran, his country does not have this problem .Makes me just wanna run up to the podium and b*tch slap the punk.My potty mouth was nothing compared to the insulting nature of his premise.When some refuses to acknowledge posts of mine declaring my position that are time stamped and years old and instead base his argument on a charcterization of me that he pulled out his rump that person is not to be trusted What I find interesting is that the same crowd that voted for pot also voted down gay marriage
children shouldn’t smoke pot, and that it’s an adult acivtity. You attempted to portray prohibition as somehow protecting children, when ALL reformers know it harms them. No. No one KNOWS what is your opinion.Since prohibition on alcohol our teen drunk rate has become the worst on the planet.teem use in Holland and those looking for help with pot addiction rose dramtically after they decriminalized it because intial legislation and regulation was insufficient you really should try quitting resting on your… laurels. The only thing I had to judge by was what you were saying mostly prohibitionist arguments. If you want to stop being seen in that light, stop making their case. You should really be man and just admitt the facts I posted 2 years ago and stop this childish pretending that only what I said on the thread can be applied to my argument.Its really quite pathetic when you yourself use references that are dated more than two years ago.I can show proof here at other blogs and my own that my positions have been consistent for years.You cannot show otherwise other than to throw out the crap you pulled outa yer butt Happy? Nope, that was dumb.Try and run that line of crap off to any cop or doctor in an emergency ward or the mother whos kids are hungry because dad screwed of the grocery money on potObviously you have a problem with people who approve of things like pot in our society but simply want precautions based on fact.
Tim V,for some reason wes took to atatikcng me, even though i was one of the only ones to wish him well when he went off to angola.i do not know why. however, i never bore him any ill will. he simply took to atatikcng me, as far as i can tell, because i am pro-life and a christian.
First to Morris County Native: Rick Merkt was far behind the two front-runners with only silgne digits (I think 9 votes if memory serves me correctly). I am not sure it is accurate to say that colorful gets the attention as much as votes and momentum . Christie has the most of both, followed by Lonegan, so they will get the most coverage.As to the article, I have only a simple point to make. I think it is important to define what going negative means. My definition of going negative is when one campaign decides to distort the truth and use questionable facts in portraying their opponent. It is NOT negative when your opponent has a track record that is questionable and/or underperforming, and a campaign outlines those facts in a factual way, or a campaign uses their opponent's track record or political positions to compare and contrast versus their own. So, when we say going negative, let us all be clear what that means. It is often in the eye of the beholder, as campaigns, and their supporters, don't appreciate certain facts being stressed by their opponents. Campaigns spend many, many hours trying to determine a campaign direction that would avoid talking about their own negatives. So, just because you don't like what they are saying about your guy doesn't make it negative, sometimes it is just the facts that you don't want to hear about your candidate (or his/her past performance).
Notes from the press conference [personal comntmes are in square brackets]:Withdrawing because:1) RGGI not meeting the expected allowance cost of $20-$30 a ton originally envisioned. Current auction rates are less than $2.00 at the auction floorprice [$1.89 this year].2) NJ CO2 emissions are below the 2020 target. [I suggested the NH legislature should declare success, and say we don't need RGGI any longer. Doesn't seem to have registered.3) Other laws passed post RGGI specifically target development of renewable energy. [I hadn't thought of that angle, I rather like it.]4) RGGI is essentially a tax on electricity producers and passed on to the consumers.RGGI has provided no measurable environmental improvement. Since [neighboring] Pennsylvania is not it RGGI, it's conceivable that their dirty coal plants could put NJ's clean natural gas and other plants out of business.NJ will withdraw by year's end. [Like NH's bill, Christie noted it coincides with the end of the first three year "control period." Allowances are good for the control period they're assigned to and become worthless if not spent.]There will be no new coal plants in NJ. Christie referred to them as dirty.NJ will become #1 in offshore wind energy. [Umm, Okay. We'll be watching.][The recording ending before the end of the press conference. Grr. I may look for more.]
Typo: burgeoning repel efotrfs I guess repelling C&T is part of the effort, but proximately repeal efotrfs are the issue. ;)As the new Sen. Brown is demonstrating, NE elects really mushy conservatives. It may be political necessity and expedience for them to continue to cater to Never-Neverland fantasizing, but it makes it real dangerous to give them more than limited short-term regional mandates.________As for NJ, in an immense irony there's a wee (Fed. gov't-disregarded) project there that may yank the economic rug out from under every renewables scheme on the planet. In about 5 yrs, maybe sooner. On the merest shoestring (~$2 M over 2 yrs) a little firm called Lawrenceville Plasma Physics has been consistently generating results that exceed those of the best efotrfs of any and all other (known, public) fusion programmes in the world. And they'd be far further along if they'd had adequate staffing and equipment resources.Current timelines will, it seems and I fervently hope, result in a viable licensable design for a mini generator (5MW) with a capital cost of about 5-10a2/KW, and a cost of production of about 0.3a2/kwh. (The output might rise to ~20-25 MW given adequate future engineering advances in cooling, which would slash those costs even deeper.) The size limitation (fully housed in a structure about the size of a home garage) is inherent in the design; scaling up would involve clustering or ganging them. But it would/will suck the economic life out of all the fantasy technologies; it goes them much more than one better on all counts. It's not even a radiation source; non-neutronic ( aneutronic') and hence no irradiated equipment etc. to cope with, and no waste other than stable neutral Helium-4. Over time, even coal, fission, hydro, etc. would be economic roadkill. It would/will change everything.LPP.comHere's hoping! All my fingers and toes are crossed. :)
Fred Fred FredWe have to send you back to comprehensive reiandg class. If you had read the story in its full measure you have learned that they tighten the poll sample to most likely voters from registered voters. By doing that the poll would normally be tighter because conservatives vote in primaries at a higher rate, and the more moderate voters usually miss the primary. The key to this story is that Christie is only six points for the 50 percent mark and once he reaches that point it is over for everyone else.
yes .things that make you go hmmmmmmm. Was tlkniag ot the wife toninght about that very same thing. The money . A lot of money is being floated around out there. You're right. Where does it go, that that isn't used? Termi limits, a reduction in salary works for me ..Another thign, all this money is being raised to send this one or that one to office but can't a damn dime be raised to repair our bridges, keep medicare and social security afloat, things for the American people ..I'm just saying .
Yuck ! What you describe from Hershey Lodge is NOT a glrelid cheese. It's an Apple Brie Sourdough sandwich.A glrelid Cheese sandwich is what it is. People should feel free to eat any glrelid sandwich they want but don't call it a Grilled Cheese in the historical sense.Would you take some chopped steak then add Cheddar or Brie, asparagus, red peppers and Oregano then call it a Philly Cheesesteak ? No you'd call it a Veggie Steak sandwich or something else. But you can't take a classic sandwich, switch all the ingredients and then sill call it that classic name !
I was drawn by the hensoty of what you write
they will take part in a debate on WBGO Jazz 88 on Thursday, October 22 at 8pm. But Republican gurnieatobral nominee Christopher Christie is waiting to see how Corzine responds to debate invitations from League of Women Voters debate for October 16, which would have been broadcast by the New York and Philadelphia ABC affiliate, and from NJ 101.5. Jon Corzine is afraid to debate on a major network affiliate with a large audience but agrees to a debate on a station whose board is stacked with Democrat party loyalists, said Christie strategist Michael DuHaime. He should be willing to go on network if for no other reason than to apologize to as many New Jerseyans as possible for raising income, business and property taxes, taking way property tax rebates and property tax deductions and doubling the unemployment rate. On Election Day, he won't be able to hide behind his money anymore. After Corzine initially refused to participate in New Jersey Network's October 1 debate that was sanctioned by the New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission (ELEC), NJN tried to move it back to October 22, since Corzine indicated he would take part then. That led to ELEC's four commissioners deadlocked along partisan lines, and to Corzine acquiescing to the original date. Christie Campaign Manager Bill Stepien then issued a statement inviting Corzine to debate on the later date, since it appears his schedule is also open for a debate on Oct. 22. While we have agreed to the debate, Christie has not, even after he challenged the governor to debate on that very same date-, said Corzine spokeswoman Elizabeth Smith.WBGO News Director Doug Doyle said that the October 22 date is not final, and that the station is attempting to find a way to accommodate all three candidates. There's nothing official on that on any side, because it's still in the preliminary talks, he said.The Newark-based station reaches the northern half of New Jersey, all five boroughs of New York City and parts of New York State. Doyle said that he will look into partnering up with other public radio stations if he can confirm a date with all three candidates.